Obtaining synthetic zeolite and nanocomposite from rice husk to remove mercury ions from water

  • Madina Suleimenova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhsta; LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9113-1687
  • Saule Zharylkan Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhsta; LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1600-2115
  • Meruyert Mekenova LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Aidana Tolepova LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Alibek Mutushev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhsta; LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-5608
  • Seytkhan Azat, Dr Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhsta; LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-7438
  • Tauanov Zhandos Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhsta; LLP Scientific Production Technical Center “Zhalyn”, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7580
Keywords: rice husk, adsorption, mercury, synthetic zeolite, nanocomposite

Abstract

The article presents the results of the development of new composite materials obtained from rice husk ash (ZRH). Composite materials are bound by 2wt.% silver nanoparticles and characterized using methods for determining their structural characteristics, namely: X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), scanning electron microscopy with elements of semi-quantitative analysis (SEM-EDS), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (according to the theory of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and X-ray phase analysis (XRD). According to the results of the elemental semi-quantitative analysis, the zeolite was successfully modified with silver nanoparticles, which at co-deposition amounted to 1.44%. Mineralogical phases were determined in an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and the pronounced crystal structure of synthetic zeolite of the form "analcim" and silver nanoparticles was confirmed. A structural modification of synthetic zeolite "analcime" based on ZRH was carried out in order to quickly bind zeolite with mercury. The BET results showed the formation of mesopores and micropores, while the surface area of synthetic zeolite and modified silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) was 48.94 m2/g and 0.75 m2/g, respectively. Preliminary results showed that the removal of mercury ions from the solution was from 20 to 50% of the initial concentration.

References

1. Iqbal A, Sattar H, Haider R, Munir S (2019) J Clean Prod 219:258–267. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.066

2. Das PP, Anweshan A, Purkait MK (2021) Sep Purif Technol 274:119093. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119083

3. Samanta NS, Das PP, Mondal P, Changmai M, Purkait MK (2022) Journal of the Indian Chemical Society 99:100761. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.100761

4. Fukasawa T, Horigome A, Tsu T, Karisma AD, Maeda N, Huang AN, et al. (2017) Fuel Processing Technology 167:92–98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.023

5. Carmona VB, Oliveira RM, Silva WTL, Mattoso LHC, Marconcini JM (2013) Ind Crops Prod 43:291–296. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.050

6. Banerjee S, Barman S, Halder G (2017) Groundw Sustain Dev 5:137–151. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.06.004

7. Belviso C (2017) Prog Energy Combust Sci 000:1–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.004

8. Gomes C, Schneider H, Silveira J, Bonan L, Romeu N, Juarez P (2021) Clean Eng Technol 4:100201. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100201

9. Khaleque A, Alam M, Hoque M, Mondal S, Bin J, Xu B, et al. (2020) Environmental Advances 2:100019. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100019

10. Derbe T, Temesgen S, Bitew M (2021) Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2021:17. http://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6637898

11. Zeng X, Hu X, Song H, Xia G, Shen ZY, Yu R, et al. (2021) Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 323:111262. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111262

12. Wen J, Dong H, Zeng G (2018) J Clean Prod 197:1435–1446. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.270

13. Roshanfekr Rad L, Anbia M (2021) J Environ Chem Eng 9:106088. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106088

14. Tauanov Z, Tsakiridis PE, Mikhalovsky S V., Inglezakis VJ (2018) J Environ Manage 224:164–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.049

15. Sumesh E, Bootharaju MS, Anshup, Pradeep T (2011) J Hazard Mater 189:450–457. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.061

16. Tauanov Z, Lee J, Inglezakis VJ (2020) J Mol Liq 305:112825. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112825

17. Güngör D, Özen S (2021) Case Studies in Construction Materials 15:e00576. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00576

18. Monique MC, Lacerda LV, Alves AK, Bergmann CP (2017) Fuel 190:268–273. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.016

19. Sánchez-hernández R, López-delgado A, Padilla I, Galindo R, López-andrés S (2016) Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 226:266–277. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.037

20. El Bojaddayni I, Emin Küçük M, El Ouardi Y, Jilal I, El Barkany S, Moradi K, et al. (2023) Miner Eng 198:108086. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108086
Published
2023-09-11
How to Cite
Suleimenova, M., Zharylkan, S., Mekenova, M., Tolepova, A., Mutushev, A., Azat, S., & Zhandos, T. (2023). Obtaining synthetic zeolite and nanocomposite from rice husk to remove mercury ions from water. Chemical Bulletin of Kazakh National University, 109(2-3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15328/cb1323