Slurry, chlorophyll-a, organic matter and nutrients as indicators of the trophic status of the Angara cascade reservoirs

  • E. Tarasova Federal state budgetary institution of science A.P. Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry SB RAS
  • A. Mamontov Federal state budgetary institution of science A.P. Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry SB RAS
  • E. Mamontova Federal state budgetary institution of science A.P. Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry SB RAS
Keywords: slurry, chlorophyll-a, organic matter, nutrients, Angara reservoirs

Abstract

Research components of trophic status and ionic composition of waters of the Angara cascade reservoirs in spring of 2013 showed that content of these components, as well as trend of the average values along the river due to creation time, place in the cascade, biological and hydrological processes, as well anthropogenic factors taking place in the river basin. Index of trophic condition allows to determine the nutritional status of the Angara cascade reservoirs in the period of study.

References

1. Ivanov I.N. Hangars hydropower and natural environment [Gidrojenergetika Angary i prirodnaja sreda]. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991. P.128.

2. Glazunov IV Hydrochemical conditions and chemical runoff Angara River [Gidrohimicheskij rezhim i himicheskij stok reki Angary]. Proc. LINa [Tr. LINa]. 1963, 3 (23). P. 57-94.

3. Kontsevich V.I. Chemistry of the Angara River [Himicheskij rezhim reki Angary]// Math. Biolog. geographer. Inst at ISU [Izv. Biolog.-geograf. In-ta pri IGU]. 1930. 5(3). P. 67.

4. Bochkarev P.F. Hydrochemistry rivers of Eastern Siberia [Gidrohimija rek Vostochnoj Sibiri]. Irkutsk, 1959. P. 155.

5. Nikolaeva M.D. To hydrochemistry Irkutsk water reservoir [K gidrohimii Irkutskogo vodohranilishha] // Biology Irkutsk Reservoir. Edited by G.I.Galaziya. Proceedings of the Limnological Institute [Biologija Irkutskogo vodohranilishha]. Moscow: Nauka, 1964. II (31). P. 17-40.

6. Verbolova N.V. Formation of hydrochemical regime Bratsk water reservoir [Formirovanie gidrohimicheskogo rezhima Bratskogo vodohranilishha] // Formation of plankton and hydrochemistry Bratsk water reservoir [Formirovanie gidrohimicheskogo rezhima Bratskogo vodohranilishha]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1973. P. 78-118.

7. Kozhova O.M., Pautova V.N. Primary production in the Bratsk water reservoir and limiting factors [Pervichnaja produkcija v Bratskom vodozranilishhe i faktory ee opredeljajushhie]. Vodn. Resursy – Water. Resources. 1982, no 1. P. 128-139.

8. Izmestieva L.R. Chlorophyll content. Primary production in the Bratsk Reservoir [Soderzhanie hlorofilla. Pervichnaja produkcija v Bratskom vodohranilishhe]. Moscow: Nauka , 1983. P. 105-123.

9. Strizhova T.A. Conditions and specific features of the hydrochemical regime, composition and water quality artificial reservoirs (for example, the Ust-Ilim reservoir [Uslovija i osobennosti formirovanija gidrohimicheskogo rezhima, sostava i kachestva vod iskusstvennyh vodoemov (na primere Ust’-Ilimskogo vodohranilishha]// Author’s abstract. Irkutsk, 1985. P. 16.

10. Vorobyov S.S. Phytoplankton reservoirs of the Angara [Fitoplankton vodoemov Angary]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1995. P. 125.

11. Karnauhova G.A. Hydrochemistry of Angara and Angara cascade reservoirs [Gidrohimija Angary i vodohranilishh Angarskogo kaskada]. Vodnye resursy – Water Resources , 2008. 35(1). P. 72 -80.

12. Aliyeva V.I. Natural and anthropogenic fluxes of chemical elements in the water of the Bratsk reservoir [Prirodnye i tehnogennye potoki himicheskih jelementov v vode Bratskogo vodohranilishha]. Author’s abstract. Irkutsk, 2009. P. 19.

13. Tarasova E.N. Organic matter of the Southern Baikal [Organicheskoe veshhestvo vod Juzhnogo Bajkala]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1975. P. 147.

14. Tarasova E.N., Meshcheriakova A.I. Current state of the hydrochemical regime of Lake Baikal [Sovremennoe sostojanie gidrohimicheskogo rezhima ozera Bajkal]. Novosibirsk: IN Science, 1992. P. 144.

15. Trzhtsinskii Y.B., Levi K.G. Angara cascade hydropower reservoirs and the problem of induced seismicity [Vodohranilishha Angarskogo kaskada GJeS i problema navedennoj sejsmichnosti] . Geojekologija, inzhenernaja geologija, geokriologija – Geoecology, engineering geology, geocryology , 2009. no 1. P. 71-79.

16. Tarasova E.N., Grebenschikova V.I., Mamontov A.A., Mamontova E.A., Gamayunova K.A.. Long-term studies of the hydrochemical regime source of the Angara River - assessment of the Baikal ecosystem [Mnogoletnie issledovanija gidrohimicheskogo rezhima istoka reki Angary – ocenka sostojanija jekosistemy Bajkala]. In Coll: Problems environmental geochemistry. 1. Minsk, 2008. P. 117-119.

17. Tarasova E.N., Mamontova E.A., Prohovnik L.B., Udodov Y.N., Gapon A.E., Andrulaytis L.D., Ryazantseva O.S. Features seasonal changes in the trophic status of the source components of the Angara River in the modern period [Osobennosti sezonnyh izmenenij komponentov troficheskogo statusa istoka reki Angary v sovremennyj period]. In Coll: Water: Ecology and Technology, ECWATECH 2006. Moscow, 2006. P. 44-51.

18. Ponomareva V.V. About methods of isolation and chemical nature of of fulvic acids [O metodah vydelenija i himicheskoj prirode ful’vokislot]. Pochvovedenie – Soil Science, 1947. no 12. P. 10-18.

19. Krylova L.P., Skopintsev B.A. Organic carbon in the waters of the rivers near Moscow and large rivers of Soviet Union [Organicheskij uglerod v vodah rek Podmoskov’ja i krupnyh rek Sovetskogo Sojuza]. Gidrohim. Materialy – Hydroquinone. Materials, 1959. 28. P. 12-16.

20. Skopintsev B.A. Organic matter in natural waters (water humus) [Organicheskoe veshhestvo v prirodnyh vodah (vodnyj gumus)]. Proc. State. Oceanographer. Inst. Leningrad.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1950. 7 (29). P. 396.

21. Hecky R.E., Kilham P. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment . Limnol. Oceanogr, 1988. 33 (4, part 2). P. 796-822.

22. Kilham S.S. Relationship of Phytoplankton and Nutrients to Stoichiometric Measures. / Large Lakes. Ecological Structure and Function. Eds. Max M. Tilzer, Colette Serruya . Springer-Verlag, 1990. Р. 403-413.

23. Forsberg, C. and S.O. Ryding. Eutrophication parameters and trophic state in 30 Swedish waste-receiving lakes . Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 1980, no 89. P. 180-207.

24. Mineeva S.S. Plant pigments in the water reservoirs of the Volga [Rastitel’nye pigmenty v vode Volzhskih vodohranilishh]. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. P. 156.

25. Trifonova I.S. Assessment of the trophic status of water bodies on the content of chlorophyll and plankton [Ocenka troficheskogo statusa vodoemov po soderzhaniju hlorofilla a v planktone]. Methodological problems in the study of primary production of plankton inland waters. - St. Petersburg. Gidrometeoizdat [Metodicheskie voprosy izuchenija pervichnoj produkcii planktona vnutrennih vodoemov. – SPb.: Gidrometeoizdat], 1993. P. 158-166.

26. Golterman H.L. Chlorophyll – phosphate relationships – a tool for water management [Zakonomernosti pervichnoj produkcii v limnicheskih jekosistemah]. Algae and aquatic environment. – Bristol: Biopress, 1988. Р. 205-224.

27. Bouillon V.V. Laws of primary production in the limnetic ecosystems. Author’abstract Leningrad, 1985. P. 32.

28. Naumenko M.A. Eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs evtrofirovanie ozer i vodohranilishh]. Textbook. St. Petersburg: RSHMU, 2007. P. 100.

 

Cited by: 1

1. Boulion VV, Sirotskii SE (2015) Biological productivity of the Boguchanskoe Reservoir: Modeling and prediction. Biology Bulletin 42:361-370. CrossRef

Published
2013-09-14
How to Cite
Tarasova, E., Mamontov, A., & Mamontova, E. (2013). Slurry, chlorophyll-a, organic matter and nutrients as indicators of the trophic status of the Angara cascade reservoirs. Chemical Bulletin of Kazakh National University, 72(4), 133-142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15328/chemb_2013_4133-142